It’s all about Ultraviolet Light (or just UV Light or even just UV). UV light comes in a whole range of “colours” that we can’t see. Some birds, animals and insects can see it. It’s what we could call High Energy Light, and its high energy can sunburn you or destroy some materials (especially plastics) if they are left exposed to it for a long time.

Only about 10 -15% of all minerals glow when subjected to UV light. They are the Fluorescent Minerals. UV stirs up electrons in the mineral’s atoms, and they jump to a higher than normal orbit. But Physics requires them to go back to where they came from, and when they do that they release the extra energy they got from the invisible UV as visible light. We call this Fluorescence.  This, and the following explanation of phosphorescence, are hugely simplified.

Some of the electrons in certain fluorescent minerals do something else as well. They wait for a while before dropping back, and keep doing it after the UV lamp has been turned off. That causes their rock to continue to glow after the UV light is turned off. This is Phosphorescence, sometimes called afterglow. Phosphorescence dies away sometimes quickly, sometimes slowly. Usually you only get a fleeting view of it because it soon becomes so dim that the human eye can’t see it.  (A camera can!)   Phosphorescence can be a similar colour to the fluorescence it follows, but can also be quite different.   Images captured by a camera can be quite spectacular.

fluo-page-composite-800_72-for-webCan you imagine going to see a fireworks display in the middle of the day? Daylight would completely swamp the fireworks colours and you wouldn’t see anything (except the smoke). It’s like that with fluorescence and phosphorescence – you can only see them at night or in a dark room. Sunlight contains many UV colours, the commonest called UVA, UVB and UVC. UVC is filtered out by the atmosphere and so doesn’t make it to the ground. UVA and UVB get through. Therefore many minerals out there in the hills fluoresce all day every day – but you can’t see them doing it. You have to wait until after dark and create your own UV with a UV lamp. UV lamps can make all three of those common UV colours. UVC (also called short wave UV) is widely used to kill germs, UVB (or mid-wave UV) surnburns you and so is used in solariums, and UVA (or long wave UV) is used in clubs and discos to make your clothes and your teeth glow. They all cause mineral fluorescence, but UVC makes about 10 times as many minerals glow as the other two do.

OK. So Fluorescence, although weak, shows up nicely in a dark room with a good UV lamp. However, Phosphorescence is tens, hundreds or sometimes thousands of times dimmer than the fluorescence it replaces when the UV lamp is turned off. It is often hard to see even before it dies away. It can be very difficult, usually impossible, to tell exactly what colour it is, especially if there is more than one colour (which can happen when there is more than one mineral in the rock). It’s like being outside when some clouds start to go across a full moon. Initially you can just make things out, but you have no idea what colour they are. Then as the moon goes behind a cloud your scene gets dimmer and dimmer and soon you can’t see anything at all.

Photographing Fluorescence and Phosphorescence

Think about fireworks again. You can see them “live”, or on a screen, or in a photo. Seeing them live is best, but usually you can’t do that and you need to rely on someone filming or photographing. Sometimes the filming or photographing is good, sometimes it’s not, and so what you see can range from terrific to terrible. It’s the same with photographing fluorescence and phosphorescence. Photographing fluorescence is challenging. There are many terrible photos of it around, especially on eBay. Photographing phosphorescence, however, is much more challenging. You have to turn the UV lamps off and immediately open the shutter. A typical setting for my fluorescence photos is [ 1 sec @ f5.6 @ ISO100 ]. A typical setting for my phosphorescence photos is [ 30 sec @ f3.5 @ ISO4000 ]. Based on these settings, the total exposure value for the phosphorescence photo is 3,840 times that for the fluorescence photo.*

The brightness of fluorescence and phosphorescence can vary greatly from rock to rock. One fluorescing rock might light up the whole area around it whilst another, held at the same distance from the same UV lamp, might show just the tiniest almost imperceptible glow. So why are all my photos almost uniformly bright? Have I only included photos of brightly glowing rocks? There are two views on what is the right brightness of a fluorescence photo. One view is that your exposure setting should give an image as near as possible to what you see when you look at the rock under a similar UV lamp. Thus, brightly fluorescing rocks should produce beautiful bright photos, and weakly fluorescing rocks should result in uninteresting dull photos or no photo at all. The other view is that the exposure settings you use should produce the nicest possible image. My view is the second one. I justify it by referring to the magnificent images produced by the Hubble Telescope. Whatever object Hubble is photographing, the astronomers use exposure settings that will result in the best possible images. If my rock is fluorescing even a little bit I want my photo to show that fluorescence in the best possible light. (Sorry!)  That being said, when photographing a rock I am selling, I try to match the photo to what I see. But remember, I have the UV sources up close getting maximum brightness from that rock.

The first photo below shows a rock whose fluorescence is so weak that some people would classify it as of no interest and not worth photographing. I disagree! The second photo has many times the total exposure of the first, and shows details of the weak fluorescence.

Fluorescence page - first very darkFluorescence page

Photographing phosphorescence, which is usually both fleeting and orders of magnitude dimmer than fluorescence, would be pointless if the photo had to show exactly what is seen by the unaided eye. Indeed, a lot of phosphorescence can’t be seen at all by the unaided eye, just as hundreds of billions of stars and galaxies can’t be seen without the help of telescopes and astronomical cameras. But dim fluorescence and phosphorescence are as real as distant stars and galaxies and can be photographed to give photos that are just as valid and just as arresting as any bright fluorescence photo.

The first photo below shows the phosphorescence you see very soon after the UV is switched off. Before you’ve had time to have a good look at it, it fades away to what seems to be nothing at all. It’s actually still phosphorescing, but below the threshold  of the human eye. However, with a wide aperture, a high ISO and plenty of time, a good camera will accumulate an image like that shown in the second photo.

The Photo on the Home Page

Fluorescence page - second very dark

Fluorescence page -  SW PH used twice


2289-P21-SW,MW-FL+PHOS-V2These four little pyramid shaped rocks broke just the way they are when I sledged a larger rock. The field of view of the photo is about 12cm (4.5 in). This is a complex photo. It contains four distinct “glows”: Short Wave fluorescence and phosphorescence as well as Mid Wave fluorescence and phosphorescence. Mid Wave fluorescence and phosphorescence in these rocks are both dimmer than their Short Wave counterparts by a factor of around 2. As indicated above phosphorescence is dimmer by a factor of 1000 – 2000.

Here is how I got the photo:

The settings on the camera (tethered to a MacBook Air running Helicon Remote and Helicon Focus) were set for MW phosphoresence, [30 sec @ f3.5 @ ISO 1250] . The MW lamps were placed closer to the rocks than the SW lamps. The MW lamps were switched on.  After about 20 seconds, the SW lamps were also switched on. After another few seconds the UV lamps were swtched off and the shutter opened, but this was the tricky part. Fluorescence will swamp phosphorescence if left on for more than a brief moment after the shutter opens.  So after opening the shutter it was necessary to switch off all the UV lamps a tiny fraction of a second later, thus allowing the camera to see the SW and MW fluorescence for perhaps a tenth of a second, then the SW and MW phosphorescence for the rest of the 30 seconds. This took a lot of practice and many failures. Some parts of the photo are blurred because it wasn’t possible to do automatic focus stacking. Shown below are the four glows photographed individually (you can see the full sized images here):


 Back to TOP

* If your maths isn’t too rusty, the amount of light reaching a camera’s sensor varies directly as the shutter speed and ISO and as the square of the aperture diameter (or inversely as the square of the f number). So increasing the shutter time by 30 times, increasing the ISO by 40 times, and increasing the aperture diameter by 1.6 (= 5.6/3.5) means the total exposure value for the phosphorescence photo is 30x40x1.6×1.6 or 3840 times that for the fluorescence photo.